2009-25 Arcalon Columns

On Malism: part one



  
I had a rather controversial belief. I thought the world was basically bad (evil even *).
For most people, this viewpoint is unacceptable. Why it's outrageous!
Not everyone instinctively rejects the notion. A minority simply doesn't care. Others prefer to keep an ironic detachment at all times.
A handful of individuals may have an inkling of the depth of the horror. They are few and far between.
99% unquestionably accept the System, even if they are trapped in a cage of pure darkness. In fact, they glorify the inefficiencies and deliberate hardships that ruin their lives, thereby perpetuating them.

The reason why things suck is simple evolution.
Most conflicts are the result of shortages, which could be reduced by restraint (including birth control in the past; but this went against the fundamental biological urge to reproduce and acquire more resources).
Ecosystems are based on competition. They require a degree of deception and exclusion.
Competition can create immense wealth, but it often gets short-circuited. In practice, people prefer to make things more complicated than necessary. Rules and restrictions are used to harass and obscure.
The biggest economic problem is friction: the difficulties involved in acquiring a new job or a diploma, figuring out the relative benefits of groups and communities, endless social intrigues, power hierarchies and back-stabbing, and all the poorly defined yet complex rules.
It takes a lot of work just to live a bad life. The world would be better off if people were lazier.
______________
(* Nowadays I'm not such an optimist as I used to be.)


One contributor had an example of things deliberately being made more complex than they should be:

Review of Midwest Can spill-proof system:

When I say that the world is deeply, fundamentally evil, what I mean is that society doesn't work.
The following example involves explosive substances, the kind of thing that only happens about every other week:
I happened to buy a portable gasoline container at K-Mart, what I thought was called a 'Jerry can', but they hadn't heard that word at the gas station.
It's a 1-gallon, 'Model 1200 spill-proof system' (EPA#9MDC2P2AABM1) by 'Midwest Can'.
http://www.midwestcan.com/static.asp?path=2840,3459
Incredibly, it is not made in China but in the USA.
Many Chinese-made products I bought at K-mart failed during their first use, including tire pumps.
At the gas station, I filled the can with almost 1 gallon of regular gasoline. Then I put on the black cap
In the immortal words of Jack Slater, Big Mistake!
The black cap can be screwed on, but it can't be screwed off. It still was a bit loose. The fuel leaked out if the can was tilted even slightly!
Thinking that it wasn't tight enough, I tried to fiddle with the 'child proof' cap, and then there came a cracking sound as a hole appeared in the plastic cap from a breakaway component.
There was STILL no way to tighten or remove the black cap.
One other piece came with the can, a horrible kind of spring-loaded spout thingy.
There was no way to attach the spout to the can with the irremovable cap in place (and probably not otherwise either). It was physically impossible to seal this huge hole!
Of course K-Mart had already closed by then. That didn't prevent me from loitering in the parking lot outside their entrance carrying the defective can filled with flammable liquid like some would-be arsonist.
Fortunately I had duct tape to seal the can, but the gasoline immediately loosened the tape.
If the can had fallen over, at least half a gallon of gasoline would have spilled out. I had to drive home very slowly. A strong smell of gasoline still pervades the air as the fumes disperse.
Even if it were somehow possible to remove the black cap (it isn't), the sliding spout is a new mystery. There seems to be no way to use it to refuel a lawnmower, the original purpose of this bizarre exercise.
This kind of pointless odyssey recurs with the sad regularity of a stupid sitcom. Just last week I was trying and failing to get a Youtube account to post some masked rants without having to give Google my mobile number.

______________

However, as we've already pointed out, the most obvious example of how reality sucks is software. There are many case studies of inscrutable interfaces, deliberate over-complexifications, infuriating failures, constant crashing, and digital insubordination.
Some historic contributions from the good old days:

I spent the last two days trying to sign up for an account at whitehouse.gov so I could start an online petition.
Needless to say, the government's vastly overpriced web servers won't allow me to do that, either crashing without warning or refusing to send the confirmation email despite dozens of attempts to get them to comply.
Surprisingly, this isn't part of a conspiracy to shut up one of the few remaining dissident voices on a hyper-conformist planet.
It's simply more proof of the strange phenomenon that COMPUTERS SUCK, or to put it another way: they don't work much or most of the time; especially when they should work. Once the government gets involved, the curse is multiplied seven-fold.
Computers could become useful and powerful, but are riddled with deliberate defects and bureaucratic inefficiencies.
This is by design, the choices of programmers and their smugger corporate overseers.
Or to sum it up in one word: evil.

Twitter: white screen of death
Some claim it's a security issue.
Their screen just stays blank in an increasing number of browsers that refuse to run their script-spreading ad software. No solution appears to exist.

Conde Nast is evil
There is now ample proof that the world is kept evil by the unshakable will of the majority, but consider one specific example:
http://www.wired.com/ no longer allows posting replies on their comment threads if you have even a slightly out of date browser or computer. They clearly went out of their way to make that happen, spending a lot of time and effort on the computational crippling.
How hard could it be to make a website that just works, like in the slightly less evil 1990s? It would be easier than doing the opposite - just not evil enough.
It's not surprising that a hipster site like Wired would make things more complicated than necessary (they just loved Enron), but the trend has spread across media empires. Gawker is the worst offender. Now even Twitter refuses to load in millions of browsers.
The free Internet is decaying like a freshly made-up and embalmed corpse, fading like a lost dream.
Some formerly favorite sites that no longer allow comment posting from many browsers include realussr.com and North Korean Economy Watch.

Zonealarm is evil
The software won't block Internet Explorer from accessing the Internet, despite IE being listed as having to ask permission before going online in Zonealarm's program controls.
Zonealarm also tends to change other program access settings to make it easier for programs to go online without having to ask the user for permission.

Another LiveJournal crime
They have secretly been 'hiding' our blogs' comments with no clear way to change this setting. The only remedy is an obscure 'slashed eye' or 'unscreen' icon that requires the moderator to approve each comment individually in a multi-step process through at least four pages. It also makes it look like each approved comment has been banned. LiveJournal is literally infinitely worse than Satan.


1/5/09-1/12

Malism: beyond nihilism



  
First, an apology: there's not enough hate in these columns (still enough to get banned by LessWrong though).
We couldn't fit it all in.
They weren't really about hate anyway.
The reason for every venomous screed and invective-filled rant posted here is desperation.

They're also about what desperation can sometimes lead to: the desire to resist; perhaps the willingness to resist; who knows, maybe even the desire to get even.
Some of these truths are politically incorrect, others have barely been spoken out loud.
In the days before the alt-right and since then, they were meant for outsiders and the alienated, those few individuals who realized that other people are fundamentally different in one way: they tolerate evil to an extent that transcends comprehension.

Malism is political.
It is the absolute earned hatred of human institutions.
It's not hate for human nature (extremely depressing), the natural world (abject despair) or the omniverse (unbound horror).
These are different subjects. Short version: all is lost. Not because it's too hard to create a good world, but because it's too easy to create a bad one.

These columns are not about concentration camps and torture dungeons.
Malism is about lesser problems that could be solved, but probably won't be, all the infuriations that define human existence.
Microsoft software alone (and the public tolerance of its flaws) justifies every insult ten trillion times over. Unfortunately open source software is even worse.

It's about the triumph of lies.
You cannot bargain with evil. It could only be defeated, but apparently won't be. That is the story of the world.

Often it makes sense to blame the 'victims'. I don't criticize increases in inter-ethnic violence (an emergent behavior), but mainstream media cover-ups.

Anyone who is offended should look around instead. This column is not the problem. Conventional propriety should be forgotten.
A good place to start is the labor market, a scene of lifelong mauling by the forces of conformist subjugation - at least that is the outsider perspective.
Work is hell, but there are worse things than constant low-grade stress: constant high-grade stress.
Half of all people are born only to survive, living on a few dollars a day, consuming exactly as much as they produce (the solution is at the end of this column).

The world is not evil for everybody, or even for most people.
While the 'elite' may consider average individuals stupid, they are also surprisingly cunning. They can navigate dense jungles of bureaucracy and control without complaint.

Every economic problem exists by choice. This includes poverty, famine, homelessness, and every recession.
Usually the choice is made by powerful interest groups trying to keep their privileges.
The wealthy benefit from overpopulation and Third World immigration, but they couldn't do it without the consent of the masses.

The USA is a fascist state in the best sense of the word.
While better than almost any nation, it's still a bad place for marginal persons.
Theoretically we could all become wealthy after a painful transition decade. There is enormous unused capacity.

Sadly, most people need pain in their lives to balance their worries and fears.
Permanent stress is the only thing that can overcome their fear of oblivion.
Poverty and apathy are best buddies.
Most evil is of the second type, less obvious and more respectable than blatant violence.

However, social indifference tends to feed on itself.
The clearest sign is the falling birthrate in the West.
A simple explanation is that humans are becoming obsolete. Most current jobs could already be eliminated, while few new ones are being created. Obsolete things tend to be disposed of.

Arguably, the greatest shock about progress is that we are not getting any smarter (see the Star Trek reboots).
The culture is getting glitzier, more dramatic, perhaps more literary.
One thing hasn't changed: there usually is a villain to blame.

This is the time to discuss the rules of malism:


  • Hate has to be earned.

    This is serious business.
    Don't attack anybody until they deserve it.
    That's why racism is bad: not because there aren't innate differences between races (in attitude and intelligence), but because it's evil to punish someone who hasn't injured you yet. They don't even do that in the tribal badlands of Waziristan.
    Racism might be somewhat understandable for someone who knows the mainstream media is deliberately deceptive.
    While they are extremely biased, they rarely venture into conscious lies.
    Even so, the world is evil because the majority agrees their portion of it should be evil, and accepts the evil of the other portions.

    The most popular ways to fight evil are themselves evil.
    Don't criticize silly things (there's no time), only worthy villains. There should be no casual attacks.
    No one should lower themselves to the level of what they hate. Don't respond to a positive gesture with a negative one. Hate is too valuable to be cheapened like that.
    Just because someone is evil doesn't mean they should be punished. Only their actions can earn that fate.
    Evil should be countered, not multiplied.


  • There are no good guys.

    Never underestimate evil. It's easier to presume that any criticism is true.
    Everyone is guilty in some way. Nothing wrong with that.
    I'm one of the few good guys, but to be on the safe side assume I'm the worst of all.
    For example: would I crash my car into oncoming traffic to fight back if I was carjacked? Are you kidding??
    Surprisingly, someone who really hates all races isn't necessarily nicer than someone who only hates other races.
    I'm right about these complaints, but ineffective about publicizing them.
    Fortunately, I don't have any power. Let's keep it that way (unless there is a planetary emergency requiring extreme specialist skills).

    ______________

    On that note, while it is time to complain about the many evils committed by blacks, they are overshadowed by much more baffling white evils.
    This is a taboo subject, so I have to be careful what I say. I will try to put it as delicately as possible.
    By dint of superior numbers, whites and Asians could change the behavior of blacks if they wanted to.
    They could encourage at least some blacks to become 'nerd-like' (my unrealistic suggestion) or 'bourgeois' (Derbyshire's better suggestion).
    Perhaps blacks are less susceptible to the type of elaborate delusion-chains necessary to maintain complex civilizations. Perhaps they're not scared enough of long-term threats.

    In the past, whites were guilty of inexplicable evils like universal segregation. However, they can change.
    It's good to remember that before he became the exact opposite, Martin Luther King was considered very politically incorrect.
    Today's mainstream whites are crazy in a new way: the madness of conformist diversity.

    There are plenty of possible solutions for the problems mentioned in this and the other columns (useless as writing about them may be).
    There already is a simple (if impractical) treatment for most mental problems. It's called pain.
    If it were possible to trigger an electric shock whenever someone had an unwanted or inappropriate thought, these thoughts would stop almost at once.
    In fact, merely the threat of pain could be enough.

    So far, pain has only been used as a social control tool, not a route to self-improvement.
    Pain can only be applied in ways the majority deems acceptable, not in the most useful ways.
    For example, single mothers-to-be should be pressured to use birth control (up to abortion), instead of relying on tax-funded welfare.
    Of course such a change would be even harder to realize than abolishing corporate welfare, and that's saying a lot.

    The solution to racism is even simpler.
    It's the same as the solution to most other human problems: divide mankind into more categories.
    Encourage objectively similar people to cooperate, while identifying and monitoring the most dangerous people.

    None of this will happen. No one is waiting for clever ideas.
    Politics exists on an emotional level, as certain as the fact that congressmen will have to pretend to worship Jesus, Yahweh, or Allah to get elected.

    The most sensitive individuals tend to be the most upset about injustices in their portions of the world.
    Their anguish actually comes from underestimating evil: they half-believe something could be done about it.
    They are unable to open the escape hatch of righteous fury leading to freedom.

    The alternative would be to become a liberal, a fate worse than death.
    Fundamentally, liberals are acceptors. I'm a rejector. It's an artificial but elemental division.

    Sometimes, rejection may lead to resistance.
    How can anyone fight back against the immense accumulation of evil in society?
    The first step is to give up.
    Stop caring about things you can't control, the whole cantankerous edifice of society that exists for its own benefit.

    Few have the courage. It's an entirely new state of being.
    In that moment, some people find unexpected freedom. For the first time the world makes sense.
    This is especially true for brainwashing victims and dissidents in insidious totalitarian states like North Korea, Uzbekistan, and China.

    Evil will never stop probing deeper levels of intrusion.
    It thrives in the absence of anger.
    Anger beats tolerance.
    Change can only come from struggle bordering on violence. That can only happen if some individuals are willing to pay an unreasonable price.

    Accepting that the world is evil by design and intent, they must make resistance their priority.
    Reject the world as it is and always has been, totally and absolutely.
    Then realize you have to do it all by yourself.

    Even if you're one of the few people who agrees with me, stop agreeing now.
    Everyone is profoundly different in their values and hidden assumptions.
    Everyone stands alone.
    This insight ultimately makes it easier to get along with others.

    Evil people only matter when they have power. This requires deception.
    How can one resist a society imposing its orthodox control delusions from day one of public school?
    Do it where it hurts the most, at the very heart of its smug worldview.
    Contempt where contempt would be most unthinkable.

    An idea comes to mind.
    In Europe and the USA, the elites have long ago surrendered to the rise of Islam.
    The few holdouts who haven't are widely condemned, and appear headed for defeat. Nothing critical can be said of the cultural subjugation in polite company.

    Symptoms include cartoon controversies, the banning of critical documentaries, state-subsidized polygamy, criminal attacks and riots in which the perpetrators are identified as 'youths', no-go areas, genital mutilation, the smashing of idols from other religions, and occasional murders.
    The elites can't resist such an all-encompassing ideology, one that brooks no dissent. Or someone might start resisting them.

    To be fair, the PC-media are much worse than the movement to unite the world under Sharia. Christians and Jews wouldn't even be forced to convert, but would have to pay a tax.
    Muslim guest workers were brought to Europe from the 1960s to provide votes and make businessmen wealthier.
    The immigrants' motives are at least understandable. According to their beliefs it would be evil not to try to change society, unlike the university-educated, well-compensated, left-leaning, diversity-celebrating, one-world symbol manipulators who set the cultural tone.
    It's like comparing strangers to aliens. I don't hate radical Islamists any more than wolves.

    Admittedly, it's much cooler to have many races in one society, and potentially safer. Left to their own devices, whites can sometimes get out of control.
    However, multiculturalism as currently executed is replacing Western civilization with something even worse.

    It pains me immensely to write the following words. I have tears in my eyes as I do so.
    The effects of Anders Breivik's massacre in Norway will likely be positive.
    The young socialists whom he murdered would have continued to carry out an evil program of absolute tolerance. No amount of logic or emotion could have stopped them. These Nordic appeasers were quite literally unpersuadable.

    That doesn't mean it was an understandable attack. It's like if God ordered you to stab your baby or else he would destroy the world.
    If you're the kind of person who can do that, even though it would be the right thing to do, you would have to be deviant, hardhearted, psychopathic, or insane (Anders was the first).
    How can I say these things?
    Very easily. It helps to be 100% right.

    Surprisingly, the craven appeasement of our liberal-totalitarian overseers could be used against them, though almost no one has dared try it.
    It might be someone enslaved by the legal system - a man forced to pay extortionate child support for offspring that aren't even his, or some other outrage without end.
    Every day a thousand such people are created in the USA alone.
    If only one of these persons could find the courage to act up. An extremely long shot, I know.

    The best way to fight the System is to legally annoy it. That's how you get the politicians' attention.
    He could desecrate Korans he purchased or printed himself, join funeral protesters uninvited with his own insulting signs, encourage online heresies, start real and fake movements of like-minded outsiders, disrupt delicate negotiations, start radical political movements, and generally make a nihilist nuisance of himself, and other things.

    Any reasonable demands he might have would never be met (the legal system doesn't work that way), so what would he have to lose?
    At best, the authorities would become terrified that Islamists would respond with apocalyptic terrorism.

    Shock tactics are useful in other ways.
    They set an example for meek people. They don't owe their cultural and political masters anything, least of all respect.

    Rage is a wonderful thing.
    It's the only thing that could drive the fight for entitlement reform (i.e. default).
    As society is slowly crushed under unbearable pension and healthcare taxes, a few workers just may start to resist the burden of open-ended debt slavery.
    Stranger things have happened. Well, maybe not.

    The first political goal might be something simple, like the above-mentioned gentle suggestion to put anyone requesting government assistance on birth control (painless, no-cost IUD or vasectomy, etc).
    I might be first in line. Poverty shouldn't perpetuate itself.
    Why should single taxpayers (including virgins) support others' procreation if they were not involved with the insemination process?

    Also abolish intellectual property rights and find ways to confiscate unfair income (if there's no doubt it was unfairly earned).

    Unfortunately, I'm the smallest minority in the most politically correct age.
    All restraints are mental.
    The ideas in this column need to spread, but that would take courage.
    Courage can only come from clearly understanding the threat, and deciding it would be more frightening not to resist.

    Someone setting out on this course must decide: are they really angry?
    Furious? Livid? Swooning with rage?
    If you feel even a tinge of doubt, the nagging notion that you have gone too far and are about to do something regrettable, immediately double your rage. No, TRIPLE it.

    The world is evil because of malist decisions softly supported at every level. Submission is the lubricant.
    A few people need to do the simplest thing: see things as they really are. They may find the strength to break the ghostly chains to reject reality. That's too much to ask from most but not all.

    I urge you to give the controlling bastards the contempt they deserve, to mock their pieties. The goal is to create maximum disruption without breaking laws. Well, maybe intellectual property laws.
    Insulting evil people is fun if you can get away with it. Above all, getting even feels good. The first target? Anyone with unfair power. The first action? Do something they wouldn't want you to do.




    Read the Malism Columns:

  • Buy the book


  • 4/8/12 - 12/22

    On Malism: part two B - All is Evil.


       Malism is the belief that the world is fundamentally bad. All existing institutions and power relations are more or less evil.

    This is not a criminal, material, or existential claim, although those could also be made. It's a socio-political construct.

    The world is evil because the majority believes the world is mostly as it should be. The imposed order of society mostly balances out all the individual chaos. No amount of rhetoric, logic, or pleading can help. In fact current arrangements are mostly right for most subjects, within current imagination limits.

    Society is not nearly as advanced as it seems. It's an accumulation of monopolies, an efficient deception evolved to sustain itself, permanently rebuilding without improving much. It's good to make your peace with it. Those who don't may get depressed.

    This notion is automatically rejected by the majority consensus, but that's just how they've programmed themselves.
    People suffering indirect tortures at the hands of smug politicians will go ahead and vote for these same politicians until they become incapacitated. I've seen terminal patients begging to be put out of their misery go on to vote for rigid conservatives, and donate their remaining money to traditional churches.

    Only a negligible minority is willing to suggest things should not be this way; and even fewer have the courage to take action.

    Evil is the real force that makes the world go round, and it infuses every level of society.
    It's not the evil of destruction but of useless creation, of turgid bureaucracy lubricated by learned helplessness - also known as acceptance.

    It's the experience of using a Microsoft Windows 'powered' PC, the inexhaustible stream of torments and ordeals, the near impossibility of understanding these errors, and the near unanimous agreement of users that this is normal and to be expected.
    And I'm not just talking about Dell PCs here (those fall under the criminal category).

    The tiny subsection of society that tries to protest or resist is marginalized as if they are the ones with problems.
    Deliberate failures manifest across society, both online and off, even in our extended websites and blogs: Livejournal.com randomly changes the web address of every post after a while, making it impossible to link to them directly. Many rants and venomous screeds have been lost.
    In a similar manner, the three web counters installed in these pages stopped working without explanation, though their websites remain in business.

    These actions are only barely in the top forty most evil crimes of all time.
    Still, there's no conceivable reason for Livejournal and the webcounters to arbitrarily make things harder. Intentional disruption is a fundamental force of society.

    Evil is hard to fight because it thrives on resistance. When different types compete, they can actually strengthen each other.
    Most evil exists only to fight a second evil in a way acceptable to a third evil: for example the zoning laws in the liberal Walhalla known as Portland, Oregon, that are 'subconsciously' intended to keep scary blacks out in a doctrinaire politically correct way.

    Evil needs to be studied and perhaps brought under control, but not here.
    These columns are not really about the source of evil or even about hate, worthy as those subjects may be.
    They're about the desire for revenge.




    It can't be said often enough: there are simple solutions that could make the world almost tolerable.
    We could have ultra-low-cost housing, full employment for those who want it, and ten times cheaper healthcare, but such experiments are forbidden by law and custom. In a global pathology, our political hirelings block all meaningful change with tireless dedication and even intelligence: an instinctual rejection.
    Voters prefer politicians who establish and maintain restrictive control systems, as long as they're not too arbitrary, an annoying holdover from more primitive times.

    A few critics of the status quo go further: the world isn't merely evil, it's a hoax.
    Regardless of whether that's the case, how much do things actually suck?
    Here's a short list for your convenience:






  • You can't buy good paint brushes in the USA
    Let's start with the worst outrage: fine brushes suitable for painting thin lines are simply not sold here. If you ask an associate at a Big Box store, they can't understand the question like a syntax error.
    Fortunately there are other things you can buy much easier here than elsewhere: recreational vehicles, oversized homes, luxury yachts, private jets, ranches, skyboxes, senators and so on. (That last one is a bit unfair. They can only be rented.)
    * 2015 update: This remains true.
    * 2025 update: No you still can't.

  • Healthcare
    The most successful and expensive monopoly in human history is also the most exclusive. Every American will be paying tens of thousands of dollars to further entrench that monopoly. Five seconds in a waiting room cost more than an hour's wages, and the experts in charge have no intention of letting costs drop through natural market forces.

  • Software
    The best way to realize the world should be instantly destroyed is to use software. The rage will evaporate the greatest grief like dew before the dawn. It makes all other concerns seem trivial. Nothing else matters but the roaring hatred, the red firestorm of all-obliterating fury.
    Software is so bug-ridden, unreliable, unusable, restricting, and occluded that it can only be described as malevolent.
    We know software isn't really evil. The programmers are, on a truly gargantuan scale.

  • Get rich quick schemes
    Wonderful solutions for desperate people abound: make money at home in your spare time without working hard. Most crackpot schemes involve reselling cheap merchandise, or repetitive tasks a machine could do. Others involve manipulating financial instruments.
    All these scams attempt to acquire existing wealth from other people who've done the hard work of creating it.
    What if everyone tried to make a living that way? We'd run out of envelopes and trinket factories.
    The scam works for the same reason many people want to be artists: there are no barriers to entry. If you're self-employed, your boss doesn't insist on social skills, a rigid schedule, or impossible bureaucracy.
    Unfortunately, the powers-that-be don't want life to be simple. They want complicated distractions full of busywork and low-grade fear. People are mailed credit card applications instead of job applications.
    A real get rich quick scheme would work if everyone followed it. Ideally, it would allow people who otherwise have nothing in common to cooperate.

  • Work
    So many people hate their jobs, the dread of being wage slaves in a pointless society. They're stressed out and feel numb. Real progress has slowed to a crawl.
    Where are the robots to do all the hard work?

  • Stress
    Most problems can be solved with the simplest prescription: do nothing.
    In places with more violence than intelligence that is too much to ask. People feel an overwhelming need for dramatic action. Most conflicts are caused by the stressful overreaction to a problem, not the problem itself (see: shaken baby syndrome).

  • Tyranny
    Mankind has lovingly fostered a long line of corrupt regimes dedicated to controlling their lives. Countries like North Korea enforce their delusions with cheerful oblivion.
    Why do subjects tolerate such impositions? Because they are partially insane, and want to be dominated. The few relatively open societies are also crazy, just not as badly. They can't be as bad. Consistent evil is full-time work.

  • The concept of evil
    Too few people believe in evil itself anymore. Instead, they prefer to believe in unhappy childhoods, communication problems, or that the fault lies with them; yet the truth is so much simpler.

  • Avoidable death
    A million agonizing deaths each year could be avoided by following some common precautions. A million more merely by doing less bad things: by lowering speed limits, discouraging left turns, encouraging tele-commuting and more flexible working hours. (Also by better tracking of dangerous people, reducing drug patents, replacing half the meat consumed with protein substitutes, and providing free sterilizations.)

  • Overpopulation
    Quantity does not equal quality. It's easier to push out a billion babies than to evolve one civilization with solid property rights.
    Evolution requires failure on a massive scale to proceed. It takes many attempts to generate one useful mutation. Unfortunately, this means most organisms are redundant.

  • Jury duty
    A group of randomly selected slaves must decide if the defendant is guilty. They have to give up their income for the duration, aren't fully reimbursed for transportation, often have to pay for their own parking, and can't control the trial in any way, except for the outcome.
    The judge runs the courtroom as his personal fiefdom while the jurors listen. Cases can drag on for months. The lawyers and other courtroom professionals are handsomely reimbursed.
    In all our encounters with the 'justice system', the lawyers have wasted a staggering amount of time, not for the jurors' benefit, but for the appeal judges' subsequent convenience. Jurors have been fined and even jailed for yawning or falling asleep, for talking, for watching the news in their own homes, for faking illnesses, or for not showing up at all.

  • Alimony
    Societies sacrifice their most compliant members.
    There's been a steady increase in alimony/child support horror stories. Often the person forced to pay alimony isn't the biological father. He has to pay a large amount each month until the offspring has graduated from college. If he loses his job or income, he must rapidly find another job or go to jail.
    For ex-husbands it's a dead-end existence, toiling endless weeks just to live in a high-crime apartment complex with floating rats in the pool. It's a bit like slavery, except slaves sometimes found the courage to resist.
    The countless defenders of this system point out the 'fathers' could have abstained from having a relationship at all. Celibacy is cheap.
    On the other hand, many actual deadbeat dads evade paying altogether. The worst offenders have more children, and pass on their genes: a clear case of evolution in action.
    Why has no victim dared to really fight back? Possibly they're secretly dosed with serotonin.

  • Your papers please!
    Before boarding a US airliner, you will need to produce a government approved identification document. Your REAL ID driver's license has to meet costly federal standards.
    Traditionally, governments have used such requirements to prevent less popular groups from traveling, interacting, or even existing too much.
    The public thinks it's reasonable to need government permission to own real estate or listen to the radio: Howard Stern expects his listeners to produce their birth certificates to get a state-licensed ID to get a bank account to get a credit card to get a Sirius account. He thinks you're crazy to think this is crazy.
    It's true that airlines have to search passengers for weapons, but there's no non-political reason for the government to do this job. Since the passengers are out in public, there's nothing to prevent the airline from photographing everyone (unless cameras steal souls), and using facial recognition software to check for terrorists.
    Apparently some tasks are so annoying the government has to do them: most licensing, nursing homes, divorces and wars. Prostate exams are next.

  • the absence of nudity on network TV
    Violence and some bad language are OK, but Allah dislikes boobs to be seen onscreen. Or maybe it's just your parents when you're watching with them.

  • Bureaucracy
    Bureaucrats provide a product that shouldn't exist, a monolithic maze of hidden barriers and entrenched power blocks.

  • Education
    The violent chaos of the schoolyard is the flip side of authoritarian control. The real lessons learned in schools aren't listed on the curricula. The unionized bureaucrats wouldn't care anyway. Education is mostly about establishing hierarchies based on popularity and social talents: what you need to function in society.

  • 'Victimless crimes'
    People like Richard Paey are sentenced to long jail terms for using painkillers. Governments strive to control not only their subjects' actions but their very perceptions.

  • Asset forfeiture
    When the government steals it's not theft. If someone is only suspected of selling or using drugs, the government will simply confiscate the property where the drugs were found, and sell it.

  • the 'Help' button function that came with most software products.
    Few things are worse.

  • the Showbiz Delusion
    Why do so many people want to become artists, actors, models, musicians?
    Not because these jobs are more pleasant. They simply have the fewest gatekeepers. People can start right away, and easily visualize their next step. They think they can back out if they change their minds, or in the unlikely event a better opportunity materializes (it won't). It can take years to realize there is no market for their efforts.
    If someone wanted to become a plumber, they might have to pay a year's salary in advance to enroll at a government-approved community college.
    It's all or nothing: the barriers created by the devils-in-charge are rising, and the resulting collapse may be terminal.

  • Virtuosity
    People enjoy making things seem more complicated than necessary without explaining them. It makes them feel more useful. This simple fact causes 37% of human problems. It goes back to the days when writing was the secret skill of a tiny elite, and religious texts were controlled by a priestly caste.
    Some examples: musical notation, mathematics, jargon, apprenticeships, hazing, mechanical skills, higher education, languages and dialects, financial manipulations, cultural elites, the legal system, fashion, sports, professional monopolies and guilds.

  • Religion
    The problem isn't that it's false, but that it makes life more tolerable for some, and thereby helps prolong existing problems.

  • Jobs
    Did I already mention this? What will people put up with to survive? Usually, a fate slightly worse than death.

  • CEO salaries

  • Banks can steal your money and the cops will let them.
    Some of the evil things that banks get away with:
    -deceitful fees.
    -cashing checks without verifying the existence of the funds in question. If you accept a check from a third party, the bank will add the sum to your account without bothering to verify if the check is valid. When the check bounces, the bank will steal back the money even if you already spent it, or 'returned' the money to the issuer, a popular scam that has affected many people.

  • Touch typing
    (Also see: magic eye pictures) The clearest example of the reality hoax. So-called 'touch typing' is simply impossible to learn with the current horrendously inefficient methods. Why is no one researching ways to make the second most important communication method of our species any easier? There is a total lack of research. Why are there no websites, forums, papers, discussions on methods and theory? We challenge anyone to look closer.
    Why aren't there finger rails and restraints, specially designed keyboards for hunt and peck typist, different key shapes, deeper keys, or software that detects and fixes mis-typings, by ignoring the weaker simultaneous key punch while adding a tiny shock to discourage this type of error?

  • Zoning laws
    After years of imposing high property taxes based on expected resale values, the authorities can make someone's land worthless overnight by eliminating the ways in which it can be used.

  • Taxes
    Everyone who does anything useful is punished. The tax code shows that most problems are man-made. Every taxpayer is automatically suspect. If they're lucky, the audit won't hurt too bad.

  • Perverse Paths
    Suffering tends to maximize the number of victims.
    Nature favors quantity over quality. Organisms will fill every available niche. That's why there are no uninhabited tropical islands. Evolution drives species toward their natural limits. Given time, any society will end up in the worst (for the individual) condition in which it can still survive. Evolved from failure, humans live in a permanent emergency.

  • IMAX
    For some reason, the most impressive display technology ever invented is used to make the dullest movies.

  • the tyranny of the mainstream
    Most people will unthinkingly defend the status quo. The world's features have been chosen by democratic majority. This is what they have selected out of all the possibilities.

  • Confined mobs
    Prisons, the armed forces, refugee camps, slums, public housing, and poverty prove that hell is other people.

  • Engineered scarcity
    Society has many built-in layers of deception and bureaucratic control. Powerful monopolies protect themselves with barriers and restrictions, making their products more valuable. There are no WalMart-equivalent hospitals, schools, lawyers, or even housing. This makes life more expensive and less predictable. That's exactly how they like it.

  • Engineered ignorance
    There are many knowledge monopolies. Science hoards the truth.
    Popular books about relativity or quantum physics keep repeating the same few metaphors, complete with false explanations. With luck, there might be one new idea that can be explained in a few sentences. These nuggets are few and far between.
    It's all or nothing: accept the few oversimplified explanations, or give up four years and $ 100,000 to the education-industrial complex. Love of learning only applies to the liberal arts.

  • Respect for life
    Contempt for life would be more honest. Humans are the arbitrary outcome of brutal evolution. Logically the pain will only get worse without end.
    Political leaders care deeply about stem cells that can't feel a thing, but not at all about the millions of animals killed painfully every day.

  • Polygamy
    If one third of men have two wives, one third of men will have to stay single. The most common form of polygamy is serial monogamy.
    Some of the worst polygamists are gay. Trying to avoid being 'outed', they keep up appearances by dating a chain of pretend girlfriends. There's a reason gay genes have thrived for so long.
    As always, the primary victims (less successful men) applaud those who commit the offense, delusionally hoping to emulate the successful polygamists.

  • Free software
    'The Gimp' is a free image manipulation program that didn't even bother installing the help files. Want to crop, rotate, edit, or modify an image? Perhaps there's a tool for that. Not that it matters: any change undoes the previous one.
    All software is brutally hard, but free software is just that little bit eviler. Our suggestion: make it 100 times simpler, and make it so that it works. Or perhaps a simple version that only does a few things, then adds functions as needed?

  • Porn
    Is porn crude because the consumer is aroused by deliberately coarse behavior, or is porn crude to make it seem unlifelike? Definitely.

  • The denial delusion
    Entertainment is about distraction, not about the society in which it takes place. The biggest idols are those persons who can make the biggest problems seem trivial, not those who can actually explain them. Popular sitcom and movie characters have well-paid jobs (impresario, producer, designer, ad executive), and live luxury lies, sorry, lives. How can a 24 year old yuppie have such an expensive apartment, without mentioning those forces that prevent that from happening?
    Anyone looking for new ideas should toss their TVs.

  • No more frontiers
    Our economic system may stimulate growth, but it also maximizes stress. Instead of having to rely on others, some would like to solve their own problems, even if their personal economy was to be radically simplified. They would be willing to sacrifice their standard of living for more stability. But there is nowhere left to escape to.

  • Modern SF
    Are SF stories set in the past or the future? We can't tell anymore. Commercial SF is all about genre tropes, which now take an effort to learn. As characterization becomes more important, it's rare to find new scientific ideas. Instead, it's all about social alienation, intrigues, organic societies, pseudo-magic, and other standardly fantastical elements.
    You can tell what kind of story you're dealing with just from the first few lines, and often from the title alone.
    For the dwindling handful of readers who still like old-school SF in the style of Arthur C. Clarke: books with many specific nouns are better. It only takes a glance at a random page to tell.

  • Literary SF
    According to 'serious' critics, the only good SF is not SF. It needs more human emotion and less science. Much less science. Let's just abbreviate it to F. When trying to read modern SF, I'm always cursing it's so boring. Too many characters and no extreme science. Nothing wrong with that, but call it 'fantastical' fiction then.
    Also, don't try to create a 'plausible' future, they're boring and inevitably wrong. Create an unexpected but just barely possible one.

  • Social depression
    A big part of the human brain is dedicated to detecting competitors in the environment. When they're too numerous and too far ahead, the brain gets discouraged and tries to find some other activity with fewer competitors to specialize in.
    Unfortunately, these fields also have the fewest customers. The losers' discouragement manifests itself passive-aggressively, with rare outbursts of violence. They go into conservation mode and try to make do with less, making it even harder to escape the cycle of failure.
    This helps explain rigid social hierarchies, homelessness, cults, radical Islam, failing revolutionary movements, and the entire dysfunctional Third World. It's why there exists more than one country.

  • Coming of age
    A mixture of rude instinct and suppression. No sex (or handholding in high-polygamy areas) allowed by order of God.

  • The normalcy assumption
    New ideas are presumed wrong by default. People think that their civilization is the normal one, and all others are nuts (the second part is technically true).
    Civilizations could be described as wobbly towers that have to be constantly rebalanced to prevent a collapse. Many possibilities had to be missed on the way up.

  • 'magic eye' pictures
    Of all the non-stereoscopic 3D picture illusions, these are the worst. A good example of the Virtuosity Effect: it would be easy to create a simple 'magic eye' picture that almost anyone could see, but now they're all ultra-detailed brain-busters that only cause splitting headaches.

  • literature
    Most Nobel Prize-caliber fiction is infuriatingly boring, wallowing in unpleasant details and emotions. Serious authors act as if they're important, but they fundamentally accept the world as it is. The ultimate agents of the establishment, they monopolize NYT book reviews, PBS panels, and liberal arts courses.
    Someone should dare to think about the rest of the universe, the taboo truths of this world, and the fundamentally unknown.
    The truth is that real life is crap, a mix of hidden codes and competitive deception. The mundane doesn't deserve the respect that serious authors bestow on it. Life needs to be described from the outside, like an ant colony or an infection, things most people never even think about.
    Arthur C. Clarke didn't write about characters or relationships but made them seem insignificant. That's how history should be taught; a mess of population pressures, changing landscapes, and semi-random violence. The truth lies in the numbers.

  • Sycophantic book reviews
    They praise the author's literary skills without revealing anything about the plot. You can find many examples in the Barnes and Noble bookstore magazine, if it still exists.

  • X-aggeration
    A made-up term for when a mass-market 'edutainment' program tries to 'sex up' an incredibly spectacular event in the most sensationalist way they can imagine, completely unaware that their efforts are hopelessly inadequate. It's accompanied by dramatic music and narration.
    One example is when the Discovery Channel used file footage of flowing lava to illustrate the period when the earth's entire crust was molten. Worst of all was when they tried to use CGI animation to depict a supernova, and even showed stars in the background.
    In the future, those puny efforts will look as dumb as those nineteenth century postcards that predicted zeppelin bicycles by the year 2000. Except those might have actually worked.

  • Lawyers
    Dozens of Bill Clinton aides racked up huge legal fees when they were deposed during the political inquisitions of the late nineties. Many were 'forced' to go into debt to afford legal representation. At no point was it suggested that people shouldn't hire attorneys if they didn't do anything wrong.
    Perhaps this entry shouldn't be about lawyers, but about the legal system itself, except it's not possible to opt out of the latter. At least you can still represent yourself in civil and criminal court, even if few falsely accused defendants dare to do so.

  • Cell phones
    Everyone is hearing voices these days. As Unabomber style outcasts (only with less steady hands), we don't expect to own chatterboxes ourselves unless they're free.
    Why do people need to talk so much? It's all about the illusion of control. Technology is increasingly used to create pseudo-improvised, unplanned lifestyles, in the same way that people would rather watch a video than read an explanation. Anything to keep busy and not have to think.

  • Star Trek
    In the late nineties, the corporate owners of the Trek franchise tried to sue Trekkies into oblivion for the crime of creating unauthorized fan sites. The final straw was when Deep Space Nine changed the date of Khan's first appearance. That was even worse than the Kazon storyline in Voyager.
    The series' main problem is that the writers don't realize how advanced their own imagined technology and future society really is. Most episodes could have been set in the past by changing a few details.
    It's time to start an open source shared multiverse with many different worlds that can be improved without end.

  • Cities
    There are no 'cheap cities'. In blatant violation of the law of supply and demand, the cheapest apartment in New York now rents for about $2000 per month, and it's already been sub-let.
    To be fashionable, you don't have to be cool, you just have to be rich. Meanwhile, labor slaves have to commute for hours until they reach a suburb downscale enough to afford a thirty-year mortgage.

  • Universities
    Flush with donations and paper wealth from the speculative boom of the previous decade, universities went on lavish spending sprees. Campuses abound with new recreation centers, stadiums, and study lounges. The cost of a top-brand college now exceeds $1000 per week. They make a big fuss about tradition and elite qualifications. They don't try to find new ways to make learning easier, since they're secretly afraid they might put themselves out of business.

  • Long-term care insurance
    Why would anyone want to pay in advance to be kept alive as an incontinent mummy? Because Jezus, that's why. Instead of long-term care insurance, we believe in euthanasia insurance: a single .45 bullet.

  • Marriage
    In this day and age, you have to be an insane optimist to get married. A marriage license is a lifelong servitude license in the event of a divorce, thanks to alimony and palimony. The rewards would have to be unusually large to put up with such a risk.

  • Offspring
    My greatest asset is that I don't have any children (Not all Arcalon contributors are so lucky). It's the best thing in my life. Seriously, it's a great feeling. I'm a million dollars ahead by doing nothing. A lifetime of worries and obligations simply don't exist. Why create more hostages for the System to exploit, at incredible expense and effort?
    If only there was some way to be paid for it.
    This perspective needs to become more mainstream. Everyone has their own priorities. What works for most doesn't work for some.

  • Transgender pronouns
    While persons who choose to have 'sex change' operations should be strongly supported in their endeavors, third parties should not pretend that transsexuals have actually changed genders. At most they have had a partial sex change. They still have male or female elements in their past, or at the genetic level. They should be considered a new, third gender.

  • Air travel
    For primitive primate reasons, many social relationships can only be settled in person. Each airline flight adds over a ton of CO2 to the atmosphere for each passenger crossing the ocean. Airlines exist as part of a vast pre-existing infrastructure, solving problems they helped create.
    The pricing is even worse. Seems like the only way to fill up a plane is to have as many ticket prices as passengers.

  • Movies in theaters
    The last movie one of our contributors paid to see in a second-run theater was 'Titanic'. They were tearing down the back of the building while the end credits began to roll. Within a few months, it had been replaced by a full-cost first-run multiplex. Since then, ticket prices have been closely linked to the cost of health insurance and CEO salaries.

  • Top-down focus
    In the Harry Potter and even the Star Trek universes, the basic principles and implications of society, history, physics, technology, religion, economics, and science are kept obscure. The focus is on intrigue and drama. The basic rules are ignored. Only the results matter.
    That's exactly how people like things in real life. The details are more meaningful than the big picture. It's easier to lose oneself in the mundane facts of existence than to look too closely at its deep patterns, which can be disturbing. No one is responsible for society as a whole, only their own small portion of it. Most societies don't want to understand themselves too well. It would lead to uncomfortable questions.
    Yet there are many simple statements that could change everything, if only they were believed. For example: the principles of evolution applied to humans, economic psychology, human biodiversity as it really is, skeptical thinking as a way of life, the notion that the universe is absurd, that metaphysics implies parallel universes, that there are infinitely more possible complicated minds than simple minds like ours, and that our universe is vastly more complex than it needs to be to allow us to exist.


    Got something to say?
    Our Blog Pages




    The most radical hard SF novel of the first quarter of the 21st century: Infinite Thunder by Jack Arcalon.
    Buy the book


  • 11/20/09-4/15/11-1/12-07/25